In opting for unitranche debt, private equity firm Brentwood Associates went for the sure thing in last week’s dividend recapitalization of The Teaching Company, a for-profit secondary-education company based in Chantilly, Va. Brentwood tapped the Senior Secured Loan Program, a joint venture between Ares Capital and GE Capital, for $170 million of unitranche debt to back the recapitalization.

The road for dividend recaps has been bumpy lately. Several deals were scotched in the first quarter, and Grede Holdings and Spitzer Industries pulled their efforts last week after failing to hammer out agreeable terms with investors. Spitzer launched on Feb. 10, while Grede spent only two weeks in market before throwing in the towel.

By going the unitranche route, Brentwood sidestepped the headaches of syndication in a choppy market. The elimination of execution risk is the product’s biggest appeal to sponsors, especially in times of rattled markets. Unitranche lenders guarantee the entire financing amount. They also can turn around closing in roughly two to three weeks, versus a syndication period of 4-6 weeks for traditional senior loans. There’s one credit agreement and no dickering between senior and subordinated lenders.

When sponsors rushed to close deals last year ahead of potential tax changes, the Senior Secured Loan Program had one of its best years ever. The program closed $2 billion of loans for 13 deals, more than doubling the number of issuers in the portfolio to 22, according to Timothy Lyne, a senior managing director who oversees investments in the fund. The Senior Secured Loan Program was formed in December 2007 with about $3.6 billion of committed capital.

Of course, convenience comes with a premium. Brentwood did not disclose terms of the financing, and Lyne would not comment on specifics of that transaction. However, he said unitranche debt typically can command a premium of 50-100 bps over traditional senior financings, depending on market conditions. More-volatile markets will require higher premiums, while frothy conditions bring tighter pricing. Closing costs run about the same, Lyne said.

Prior to Spitzer’s cancellation, Credit Suisse shopped the company’s traditional senior loan at a revised 7.23% yield (L+525/1.5% floor/98.5). Even then, investors wouldn’t bite, and financial sponsor Stephens Group walked away.

Thoma Bravo collected a dividend from Vision Solutions this month but spent weeks in market revising terms, for a final blended rate of 7.3%, with a $240 million first-lien term loan at a 6% yield (L+450, 1.5%, 99) and a $90 million second-lien term loan at 9.85% (L+800, 1.5% floor, 99).

Market sources point out that while the initial outlay may be more expensive, the cost of unitranche debt over time is not as pricey as some think. It is structured as a single amortizing term loan, and that keeps the weighted average cost of capital constant over time. In a traditional senior/junior split structure, the weighted average cost increases over time, since senior debt amortizes and junior debt does not.

Unitranche pricing is set in stone at the time of closing – there’s no flex language in the loan agreement, which is great when a fluctuating market is shifting toward higher rates, but not so much when prices are trending lower.

The field of unitranche underwriters is limited. The most well known in the middle market include the Ares/GE venture, Golub Capital, Ableco Finance, Barclays Private Credit Partners and newcomer NXT Capital, which partnered with Ares to provide $143 million in unitranche debt to back a bid for Hooters of America by Wellspring Capital Management.

Allied Capital was one of the first finance companies to offer the product in the mid-2000s, and the firm was purchased by Ares about two years ago. A couple of Chicago-based lenders are considering adding the product to their lineup but have yet to make a move.

The Senior Secured Loan Program can hold up to $300 million per transaction, with GE providing a revolver on top of that amount, while Golub Capital can hold up to $100 million, according to sources.

At this point, unitranche debt usually competes against other capital structures, not other unitranche lenders, Lyne says. In addition to a split senior/junior debt deal, arrangers can offer senior stretch loans that stretch leverage by replacing a portion of junior financing. Unitranche underwriters can one-up that offer by going deeper into the capital structure by replacing all junior debt. Typically, senior stretch loans only stretch by a quarter to three-quarters of a turn, depending on the deal. Senior stretch loans also are syndicated and therefore are subject to execution risk.

The product is trying to lure business away from the mezzanine market, but does not yet pose a major threat. Mezzanine remains a firm staple of middle market financing: it’s widely available, it is unsecured, and it offers looser financial covenants than senior secured debt, unitranche or otherwise.

Moreover, in times of default, a borrower can conserve cash by having the ability to shut off payments to mezzanine holders. Asks one mezzanine banker: How many senior lenders are willing to forgo interest payments? – Kelly Thompson

Follow Kelly on Twitter for Middle Market news and commentary.

Follow Us

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of S&P Global Market Intelligence or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P Global Market Intelligence’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P Global Market Intelligence assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P Global Market Intelligence does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P Global Market Intelligence has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P Global Market Intelligence does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, (free of charge), and and (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at